In this paper, I argue that the generalization on the island repair, which is simply based on the dichotomic analysis of contrastivity of correlates, cannot provide a complete account for the fragment data in terms of island sensitivity. Refuting the generalization I propose that island insensitivity of non-contrastive fragments can be induced not by island repairability but by island evasion strategies such as short and cleft sources. I further claim that island evasion strategies can be applicable to the derivation of fragments if the correlate of a fragment is present inside the choice function scope. Therefore, a conclusion is drawn that non-contrastive fragments are not sensitive to an island since a choice function interpretation triggered by an indefinite correlate can render island-escaping effect without movement involved.
1. Introduction
2. Contrastivity and Island Sensitivity
3. Island Evasion Strategies
4. Correlates of Fragments and Island Evasion Availability
5. Choice functions and Island Evasion Effects
6. Conclusion
(0)
(0)