The Collective Dispute Mediation was introduced to Korea with complement the Verbandsklage which was said to be poor at monetary compensation for consumers damages, and The Collective Dispute Mediation also seems very likely to the class action, but one can resolve the dispute before filing a law suit under the Collective Dispute Mediation. The validity of the Collective Dispute Mediation is the same as the settlement in court . After reaching the Collective Dispute Mediation, one may have a right to ask the compulsory execution. Under the Collective Dispute Mediation the damaged party must take part directly in the dispute, because the Collective Dispute Mediation is also included in the dispute resolution. Therefore a problem that how can the damaged consumer, who do not directly take part in the dispute process, get the remedy alternatively may arise. However, this problem is solved by Compensation Plan Letter which is described in the Framework Act on Consumer . By the Compensation Plan Letter, the person who do not directly take part in the dispute process can be remedied ex post facto(Article 68). This thesis is study on The Function and Task of Collective Dispute Mediation in the Framework Act on Consumer in our state.
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 한국소비자법과 집단분쟁해결제도의 도입
Ⅲ. 소비자기본법상 집단분쟁조정제도
Ⅳ. 소비자기본법상 다른 소비자분쟁해결 제도와의 관계
Ⅴ. 집단분쟁조정제도의 운용방향
Ⅵ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract