
신속절차에 관한 아시아 4개국의 국제중재규칙 비교 연구 68) - CIETAC, HKIAC, SIAC, KCAB를 중심으로 -
A Comparative Study on the Expedited Procedures of International Arbitration Rules in Four Asian Countries: CIETAC, HKIAC, SIAC, and KCAB
- 박범철(Beom-Cheol Park) 주이화(E-Wha Joo) 심상렬(Sang-Ryul Shim)
- 한국중재학회
- 중재연구
- 제23권 제1호
- 등재여부 : KCI등재
- 2013.03
- 177 - 200 (24 pages)
Recently, many international arbitration institutions have responded to the business requirements of their users and have revised their rules to enhance the time and cost efficiency. Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB) revised the international arbitration rule in 2011, introducing new arbitration mechanisms like the expedited procedure. Also other Asian arbitration institutions introduced the expedited procedure in their international arbitration rules. Now expedited procedures are regarded as a very attractive system in the field of international arbitration. Accordingly, this paper reviewed the expedited procedures of four Asian countries, including China(CIETAC), Hong Kong (HKIAC), Singapore(SIAC) and Korea(KCAB). The purpose of this study is to find out meaningful implications to improve the Korean system. Based on this review, some recommendations are suggested as follows. First, the scope of the expedited procedure has to be adjusted upward than the current 200 million won. Second, there should be a fee schedule only for the expedited procedure. Third, in case of small amount international disputes, written examination should be more used in the expedited procedure. Finally, KCAB should make strong efforts to improve the awareness and usage of the expedited procedure in Korea.
I. 서론
II. 주요 국제중재기관의 신속절차 내용
III. 주요 국제중재기관의 신속절차 비교 분석
IV. KCAB의 신속절차 개선방안
V. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract