상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
147824.jpg
KCI등재 학술저널

The Principle of Facticity: Outline for a Theory of Evidence in Arbitration

  • 4

International Arbitration has distinguished itself as a method for dispute resolution that pleases both common and civil law practitioners. It, however, is not free of criticism, especially when fact-finding and evidentiary issues are at play. Perhaps because fact-finding is very closely linked to the culture in which they lie, perhaps because of the lack of a clear evidentiary rules governing international arbitration, a theory of evidence in international arbitration is still far fetched. Through the analysis of the distinctions between dispute resolution systems and the search for truth paradigm, this paper aims to develop and present an outline for the development of a theory of evidence in international arbitration.

Ⅰ. Introduction

Ⅱ. The Philosophic Aspect of Proceedings (Judicial and Arbitral)

Ⅲ. What is Truth? – Francis Bacon

Ⅳ. The Truth in Legal Proceedings

Ⅴ. The Arbitrator’s Duty and the Search for the Facts

로딩중