This paper investigates the U.S. courts’attitudes toward the legal doctrine of adhesion contracts, which have been employed as contract defenses by individual consumers who have entered into consumer arbitration agreements with businesses. Some requirements have been added to the sole adhesiveness of the arbitration clause that can invalidate the arbitration clause, including unconscionability and unreasonable harshness. It seems that the U.S. courts have moved toward a more tightened stance in evaluating the validity of consumer arbitration clauses, favoring consumer arbitration.
I. 서론
Ⅱ. 미국의 부합계약법리
Ⅲ. 소비자중재조항의 부합계약성
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract