상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
147894.jpg
KCI등재 학술저널

론스타의 투자조약중재 제기 쟁점과 한국 정부의 전략적 대응방안

The Key Issues of Lone Star Investment Treaty Arbitration and the Korean Government Strategy

  • 94

The purpose of this paper is to take a countermeasure of the investment treaty arbitration that Lone Star claimed to the Korean government. In particular, this study suggests procedural measures to be prepared by the Korean government after the arbitration award. The actual remedy in ICSID arbitration is the annulment procedure of arbitration award. Therefore, this study analyzed the measures that the Korean government can prepare based on the annulment grounds: the inadequacy of the constitution of the arbitral tribunal, the excessive power of the arbitrator, the corruption of the arbitrator, and the serious violation of the rules. First, the Korean government should decide whether to proceed with the annulment procedure after the arbitration award. Second, if they decide to do it, they should review the grounds of annulment. For example, it is possible to analyze whether the relationship between the arbitrator and Lone Star can be properly in the constitution of the arbitral tribunal, whether Lone Star is eligible to apply for ICSID arbitration, or whether arbitration tribunal ignores the crucial evidence that can affect the arbitration award. Independently, the Korean government needs to discuss the investment arbitration appeal system in a long-term perspective. Key Wor ds : Investment Treaty Arbitra

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 한-벨기에·룩셈부르크 BIT 양자간투자협정 개요

Ⅲ. 론스타 외환은행 인수 및 매각절차와 분쟁 쟁점

Ⅳ. 전략적 대응방안

Ⅴ. 결 론

로딩중