South Korea became an aging society because of a low birth rate and a rise in life expectancy in 2000 when the elderly population exceed the 7% level. Especially, Busan is becoming an aged society, where the number of senior citizens at 65 or older is 14& percent or higher(477,000). The rate of Busan has the highest rates of all Metropolitan areas and at the same time 8th higher regional areas in 17th regional areas. Busan became an aging society in 2002 and then reached an aged society in 12 years. Busan metropolitan government is firstly expected to become a super aging society in 2022 when this ratio reaches 20.6% of the population. Thus, Busan will face a variety of problems. This study explored the present condition of elderly housing facilities on the basis of sex, region, and then analyzed the characteristics like housing type and occupied mode. As a result, this study provided the housing policies for senior citizen s housing. Firstly, Busan needs to make the topic map of current housing status to figure out the transition phases of the total population and elderly population using elderly population data and spatial data. Secondly, aged households were a high proportion in single-family and ownership house. Busan metropolitan government has to cut local tax for a stable life one s old age using real estate assets. Thirdly, Busan metropolitan government focuses on the relocation of urban functions and regeneration of city centre rather than physical supplies like the housing site development and new town. Fourthly, the government build up the aging friendly residential environment and needs to secure local finance for senior citizen. Senior citizen wants to finish the rest of life in their village and housing. Lastly, the government needs to make the comprehensive and systematic elderly housing policy using local governance.
Ⅰ. 서론
1. 연구의 목적
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법
3. 선행연구 고찰
Ⅱ. 이론적 논의
1. 고령자 주거
2. 고령자 주거권
Ⅲ. 고령화 추세 및 지역적 주거실태
1. 부산시 고령화 추세
2. 부산시 고령가구 주거실태 특성
Ⅳ. 부산시 고령가구 주거정책 개선방안
1. 부산시 고령가구 주거정책 문제점
2. 부산시 고령가구 주거정책 개선방안
Ⅴ. 결론
(0)
(0)