옥시레이터 EM-100을 활용한 환기량과 기도내압 비교

Comparison of Ventilatory Volume and Airway Pressures Using Oxylator EM-100

이 연구는 RespiTrainer를 활용한 옥시레이터 EM-100 환기에서 기관내삽관, 킹후두관기도기, 아이-겔, 마스크를 통한 호흡량과 기도압을 비교 분석하였다. 실험기간은 2015년 7월 20일부터 7월 21일까지이며, 수집된 자료는 SPSS 18.0을 이용하여 분석하였다. 연구결과 기관내삽관이 537 ml (95% CI 530~545 ml), 킹후두관기도기 502 ml (95% CI 499~506 ml), 아이-겔 488 ml (95% CI 485~491 ml), 산소마스크 499 ml (95% CI 496~503 ml)의 환기량을 보였다. 기도압력은 기관내삽관이 <TEX>$11.34cmH_2O$</TEX> (95% CI <TEX>$11.21{\sim}11.41cmH_2O$</TEX>), 킹후두관기도기 <TEX>$10.67cmH_2O$</TEX> (95% CI <TEX>$10.60{\sim}10.75cmH_2O$</TEX>), 아이-겔 <TEX>$10.42cmH_2O$</TEX> (95% CI <TEX>$10.35{\sim}10.67cmH_2O$</TEX>), 산소마스크 <TEX>$10.61cmH_2O$</TEX> (95% CI <TEX>$10.55{\sim}10.68cmH_2O$</TEX>)로 측정되었다. 결과적으로 옥시레이터 EM-100을 이용한 인공호흡으로 적절한 호흡량이 전달되는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

The purpose of this study was to compare the ventilatory volume and airway pressure of a facial mask, endotracheal intubation, King tube, and I-gel devices with an Oxylator EM-100 using a RespiTrainer. The data were obtained from July 20 to 21, 2015. Data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 18.0 software. The ventilatory volume for endotracheal intubation was 537 ml (95% CI 530~545 ml), that for the King tube was 502 ml (95% CI 499~506 ml), that for the I-gel was 88 ml (95% CI 485~491 ml), and that for the facial mask was 499 ml (95% CI 496~503 ml). The airway pressure for endotracheal intubation was <TEX>$11.34cmH_2O$</TEX> (95% CI <TEX>$11.21{\sim}11.41cmH_2O$</TEX>), that for the King tube was <TEX>$10.67cmH_2O$</TEX> (95% CI <TEX>$10.60{\sim}10.75cmH_2O$</TEX>), that for the I-gel was <TEX>$10.42cmH_2O$</TEX> (95% CI <TEX>$10.35{\sim}10.67cmH_2O$</TEX>), and that for the facial mask was <TEX>$10.61cmH_2O$</TEX> (95% CI <TEX>$10.55{\sim}10.68cmH_2O$</TEX>). As a result, we were able to identify the appropriate ventilatory volume using the Oxylator EM-100.