본 연구는 첫째, 한국의 현행 교과서 관련 법령체제 및 그 중요 내용에 대한 분석 둘째, 이론 연구를 통한 교과서 관련 법령체제가 추구하여야 할 기본 이념의 설정 셋째, 현행 교과서 관련 법령 체제 및 내용의 문제점과 개선방안 분석을 다루고 있다. 연구결과 우리나라 교과서 관련 법령체제는 헌법으로부터 직접 도출할 수 있는 `교육기본권 보장과 실현에의 기속` 및 `교과서제도 법률주의` 원리에 부적절한 측면이 크며, `적절한 권한 분배`와 `교육과정과의 적정성 유지`의 원칙에 있어서도 문제점을 노출하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 관련 법제의 정비방안으로서 교과서제도 법률주의의 실현, 국정·검정·인정 교과서의 적정 분배, 검정제도에 있어서 행정재량의 적절한 통제, 절차법적 공정성 제고, 교사·학부모 등 교육주체의 참여 보장, 교과서 사용의무의 탄력적 적용 등을 지적하였다. 또한, 개선방안들을 입법화하기 위한 구체적 조문들을 적시하였다.
The aim of this study is to investigate the legal issues of the curriculum books system: concretely to analyze the Korean current legislative system related to the curriculum books and its important contents, next to set up the principles which the legislative system related to the curriculum books must pursue through related theory researches, and finally to deal with problem and solution of the related legislative system. The results of study are as follows. First, The analysis results show me that the clauses related to the curriculum books system are found in a Constitution, the Fundamentals of Education Act, a Primary and Secondary Education Act and so on. However, as they are almost abstract, they have to be changed into more concrete regulations by the authorities concerned. And the most of legislative contents related to the curriculum books system are included in `the Regulation concerned with Curriculum Books` as the administrative regulation. Second, I can draw as the basic principles pursued by laws related to curriculum books system the subordination to right to education, the curriculum books system ordained by legislative law, proper distribution of authority and maintenance of harmony with curriculum. Third, the present legislative system related to the curriculum books doesn`t seem to coincide with basic principles suggested above. Especially a phenomenon which the power concerned is concentrated upon the Administration problem just as a formalization of the curriculum books system ordained by the law is serious. Finally, it is necessary to actualize the principles of legislation for curriculum books system, to divide the curriculum books into a state-designated textbook, an authorized textbook, or an approval textbook appropriately, to control the executive discretionary power properly, to uplift the justice of an adjective law, to guarantee the participation of teachers and parents of students into the educational content administration, to apply the duty to use the curriculum books flexibly, and so on.
(0)
(0)