4종 『御藥院方』에 대한 비교연구

A Comparative Study of the Four Editions of 『Eoyakwonbang』 - Based on the Chapter of Pediatric Diseases

Objective : 초간본 『御藥院方』은 현존하지 않지만 몇몇 연구를 통해 그 내용이 소개된 바가 있으며, 현존하는 판본으로는 朝鮮版 『新刊惠民御藥院方』(乙亥字本), 朝鮮版 『癸巳新刊御藥院方』(甲辰字本), 日本版 『癸巳新刊御藥院方』(寬政本) 등이 있다. 최근의 조사를 통해 일본 국회도서관에 위 3종 『御藥院方』과 다른 『新刊惠民御藥院方』(靜嘉堂本)이 所藏되어 있다는 사실을 알게 되었다. Methods : 乙亥字本, 靜嘉堂本, 甲辰字本, 寬政本의 모습을 모두 살펴볼 수 있는 ｢治小兒諸疾門｣을 중심으로 내용을 비교하고, 4종 판본의 관계를 살펴보고자 한다. Results : 4종 『御藥院方』의 ｢治小兒諸疾門｣에 대한 편제, 목록의 처방명과 본문의 처방명, 처방의 서술방식, 주치증, 처방구성, 복용법 등을 살펴보았더니, 乙亥字本과 靜嘉堂本, 甲辰字本과 寬政本이 서로 매우 유사하다는 사실을 발견하였다. Conclusion : 1. 靜嘉堂本 (『新刊惠民御藥院方』)은 내용이나 형태적으로 乙亥字本 (『新刊惠民御藥院方』)과 유사하다. 2. 靜嘉堂本의 정확한 간행시기는 알 수 없지만 주로 淸代에 통용되었다는 사실을 바탕으로 15세기 간행된 乙亥字本 이후에 출간된 서적으로 판단된다. 3. 甲辰字本 (『癸巳新刊御藥院方』)은 16세기에 간행되었으며, 乙亥字本과 형태, 편제, 내용 등이 달라 다른 판본을 저본으로 하여 간행되었다고 판단된다. 4. 寬政本 (『癸巳新刊御藥院方』)은 18세기에 간행되었으며, 甲辰字本과 형태, 편제, 내용 등이 매우 유사하고, 아울러 甲辰字本의 오류가 그대로 나타나고 있기 때문에 甲辰字本이 寬政本의 藍本이었다고 판단된다.

Objectives : While the original version of 『Eoyakwonbang』 does not exist, its contents have been introduced in several studies. The existing editions are the Joseon versions 『SinganHyeminEoyakwonbang』(Eulhaeja edition) and 『GyesaSinganHyeminEoyakwonbang』(Gapjinja edition), and a Japanese version, 『GyesaSinganHyeminEoyakwonbang』(Gwanjeong edition). In a recent research, it has been discovered that there is a fourth edition of the book, 『SinganHyeminEoyakwonbang』(Jeonggadang edition), in the Japanese Parliament Library collection. Methods : Contents of the chapter on pediatric diseases were compared among the four editions to clarify their relation with each other. Results : Based on the organization of the chapter, formula names in the list and body, explanatory methods of the formulas, application, formula construction and methods of application, we found that there were great similarities between Eulhaeja edition and Jeonggadang edition, and between Gapjinja edition and Gwanjeong edition. Conclusions : 1. Jeonggadang edition is similar to Eulhaeja edition in contents and form. 2. Although the exact publication date of Jeonggadang edition is unknown, based on the fact that it was mostly circulated in the Qing period, it can be assumed to have been published after the Eulhaeja edition which was published in the 15th century. 3. Gapjinja edition was published in the 16th century and shares little similarity in form, organization and contents with Eulhaeja edition, indicating that a different version was used as the original script. 4. Gwanjeong edition was published in the 18th century, and is very similar in form, organization and contents with Gapjinja edition, repeating the same errors made in the Gapjinja edition. This indicate that Gapjinja edition was the mother script of Gwanjeong edition.