상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
152900.jpg
KCI등재 학술저널

부양의 원리와 부양적 기여분의 판단 기준

대법원 2019. 11. 21.자 2014스44,45 전원합의체 결정에 대한 비판적 검토

  • 43

Korean Supreme Court maintains the existing understanding and interpretation of the Support system under civil law, and applies it without modification to the judgment on contributory portion of special support. However, the special support considered in contributory portion is not based on the duty to support of the support system under civil law. The judgment of contributory portion of special support is not a problem of the support system but a problem of inheritance law. Korean Supreme Court has a confusion of principles and norms. The contributory portion shall not exceed the legal reserve of inheritance. Because contributory portion of special support is a part of the legal inheritance system. However, such restrictions do not apply in cases of consultation and coordination. Specific contributory portion of special support is determined at the MiniMax point through decision- making by each party.

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 민법 제1008조의 2 제1항의 ‘부양’

Ⅲ. 부양의 원리

Ⅳ. 부양적 기여분의 판단기준

Ⅴ. 결 론

로딩중