This study aims to find the major creative ideation patterns embedded in the commercially valuable patents in the mobile communication industry. For the purpose, we analyze 171 cases of the patent infringement lawsuit filed by Nokia in the United States. It is examined that what kind of TRIZ inventive principles and SIT thinking tools were applied to resolve technical contractions in each of the 171 cases respectively. Among the 40 inventive principles of TRIZ, feedback principle was used mostly and division principle the next. Among the 5 thinking tools of SIT, attribute dependency mostly used, and division the next. This suggests that what kind of inventive principles or thinking tools should be considered preferentially to resolve technical contradictions in practically important technical problems in the mobile communication industry.
I. 서 론
II. 이론적 배경
III. 데이터 수집 및 분석
IV. 분석 결과 및 해석
V. 결론 및 향후 연구방향
참고문헌
(0)
(0)