상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
커버이미지 없음
KCI등재 학술저널

만주사변 전후 국내 민족주의 계열의 재만조선인 국적문제 제기와 민족인식의 논리

Domestic Nationalists’ Nationality Problem Rasing for Koreans in Manchuria and Logic of National Recognition between before and after the Manchurian Incident

  • 45

The late 1920s, Nationalists’ naturalization as a Chinese of Koreans in Manchuria is trying to secure the rights and profits of Koreans in Manchuria. Nationalists criticized the Japanese imperialism that does not allow withdrawal of nationality of Japanese nationality. And there was a position different from those of the independence movement of forces Manchuria emphasize the armed struggle on the other hand. Nationalists argued that naturalization as a Chinese in terms of ability training of Koreans in Manchuria. This was intended to ensure a stable base of Koreans, and to provide a foundation for long-term development. Nationalist’s naturalization as a Chinese of Koreans in Manchuria was extended in response to positive changes in the immigration policy of China in 1931. Nationalists was the goal of determining the stability of the Koreans in Manchuria life is to secure a substantial benefit in residence Externally. At the same time, was raised in a big way Koreans in Manchuria problem by organizing a powerful organization central to the inward manner. Claiming the logic that it must help with the pain of sympathy nation through which, it is intended to ensure the dominant influence on Korean society. After the Manchurian Incident, cognition of Koreans in Manchuria nationalists became a request and expectations of realistic measures of the Japanese Government General of Korea and Manchukuo. Such a change because of being based on the target Koreans in Manchuria problem recognition of nationalist since the 1920s is not a confrontation with imperialism, that aspire to political and economic growth and ability training for securing profits realistic was. And such claims were justified by the choice for the nation. However, civil rights of Manchukuo that nationalists were oriented was vulnerable enough to be limited by the conflict of colonial rule system to another. And civil rights of Manchukuo limit the rights, forced to the obligation. Nevertheless, rather than criticize the fiction of civil rights of Manchukuo, nationalists was want to reduce the discrimination and to secure civil rights in such. Nationalists believed to be able to get the full rightsby doing so. Nationalists were expected to be capable of substantive benefit is ensured. Then nationalists accepted the logic of the system incorporated.

1. 머리말

2. 1920년대 일본의 만주정책과 재만조선인 사회의 위기

3. 1920년대 후반~1930년대 초 민족주의 계열의 재만조선인 국적문제 제기

4. 만주사변 이후 민족주의 계열의 인식변화와 만주국 공민권 획득론

5. 맺음말

참고문헌

로딩중