It was ‘Reconstruction(改造)’ and ‘Nation(民族)’ that Korean elites gave attention to about 1920’. With ‘Samil-National Movement’(3 1民族運動), the concept of ‘Nation’ had been decovered, but ‘Nation’ had to accept challenge of ‘Minjung(民衆)’, ‘Class(階級)’ soon. On the other hand, the ‘Argument of Reconstruction(改造論)’ that was introduced as a ‘new universal concept’ to Asia after Argument of Civilization(文明論)’s crack, became to differentiate to ‘Culturism’, ‘Democracy’, ‘Socialism’. In this term, I tried to observe that Korean elites doubt ‘capitalistic civilization(資本主義 文明)’ and focus their attention on ‘Nation(民族)’ ‘Minjung(民衆)’. And I tried to see the gap between ‘historical problems of the World’ and ‘historical problems of the Korea’ too.
1. 머리말
2. 제1차 세계대전 후 개조론의 확산
3. 개조론과 식민지 조선
4. ‘개조’를 둘러싼 견해 차이와 대립
5. 맺음말
참고문헌