This study solves the problem of lack of a clear deliberation standard by analyzing the relative importance characteristics of each expert of the pre-review opinion at the stage of pre-consideration, and suggests improvements to this, a practical purpose for improving the night view at the stage of pre-consideration. The purpose is to make it possible to become a night landscape plan. To derive a systematic deliberation guideline, first, the items presented in the existing night landscape plan evaluation items were analyzed for each expert, and second, the relative importance characteristics of the night landscape plan evaluation items at the stage of preliminary landscape review were analyzed. Therefore, the preliminary landscape deliberation stage was mainly carried out with urban planning + landscape planning as an integrated deliberation of urban planning in the development project, and the night landscape plan was hardly reviewed, so the experts who reviewed the prior deliberation were concentrated. In order to prevent such skewed preliminary review opinions, a preliminary landscape review must be conducted by expert members of the landscape review, and the review members are composed of various ex perts, but it is necessary to establish objective criteria for evaluation items.
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 야간경관계획 평가항목
Ⅲ. 사전경관심의 단계의 전문가별 특성
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌