상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
156501.jpg
KCI등재 학술저널

민사소송에 있어서 법률상 소송대리인

민사소송상 가장지배인에 관한 문제를 중심으로

  • 2

The manager stipulated in Art. 10. of the Commercial Code has a wide range of representative power unlimited by the principal unless restricted so by the substantive law itself. In civil action the court in practice has not paid full-fledged attention to whether the manager who represents the party is genuinely qualified for the authorization by meeting the capacity requirements due to unjustifiable reasons including the allergedly difficult task to scrutinize the legitimacy of the manager even entered in the commercial registration. However such a practice has to be changed as soon as practicable in view of the significance of the representative capacity as a thresh-hold question in the civil procedure. The prevalence of the pseudo managers in the civil practice who unlawfully represent the party amounts to the substantially undermining the fundamental principle for the representation by the attorney-at-law in the civil practice. This paper focuses on how to discern the pseudo manager easily in the civil practice. and deal with such an unqualified agent by applying the relevant civil procedural law.

Ⅰ. 들어가면서

Ⅱ. 상법상 지배인과 법률상 소송대리인

Ⅲ. 지배인으로 등기되었으나 실질상 지배인이 아닌 경우의 판단기준

Ⅳ. 지배인으로 등기되었으나 법률상 소송대리인으로 볼 수 없는 경우의 소송상 문제

Ⅴ. 법률상 소송대리인인지 여부에 대한 법원의 심사 및 그 조치

Ⅵ. 법률상 소송대리인의 자격을 가지지 아니한 가장지배인의 근절에 관한 근본적 대처방안

Ⅶ. 나가면서

로딩중