Structural Relationships among SEM CEO’s Positive Leadership, Members’ Positive Life Positions, Learning Organization Activities, Job Engagement, and Organizational Performance

Purpose – In today’s era of globalization, the competitive power of enterprises is growing fiercer, calling for organizations to be able to respond flexibly to survive and maintain predominance in competition. In turn, keen competition exists among enterprises for the systematic management of members’ knowledge to secure predominance in such competition. Under such circumstances, SMEs must find and utilize positive causes for change that affect organizational performance. The objective of this study is to analyze the structural relationship between four factors known from prior research—a CEO’s positive leadership, members’ positive life positions, learning organization activities, and job engagement—and organizational performance. Research design, data, and methodology – To achieve this objective, this study established the following four research problems. First, do CEOs’ positive leadership, members’ positive life positions, learning organization activities, and job engagement affect organizational performance? Second, do CEOs’ positive leadership, members’ positive life positions, and learning organization activities affect job engagement? Third, do CEOs’ positive leadership and members’ positive life positions affect learning organization activities? Fourth, does CEOs’ positive leadership affect members’ positive life positions. Additionally, to achieve the objective of this study, the research model was selected on the basis of a documentary survey of 787 full-time employees at 100 SMEs, which was used to collect related data. Results – The following conclusions were drawn. First, a CEO’s positive leadership directly affects members’ positive life positions, learning organization activities, and job engagement. Second, positive leadership only indirectly affects organizational performance. That is, positive leadership has an indirect effect on organizational performance given the parameters of members’ pPositive l