상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
158236.jpg
KCI등재 학술저널

미국 증권집단소송 사건 원고 측 변호사의 역할

  • 36

On September 28, 2020, the Ministry of Justice announced the bill for the Class Action Act. This bill intends to abolish and absorb the Securities-related Class Action Act. It also introduces the so-called Korean pre-litigation discovery. However, in light of the US securities class litigation practice, whether the introduction of the pre-litigation discovery is desirable in the field of Korean securities class action is questionable. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was enacted in 1995 to prevent the abuse of the securities class action in the United States. It stayed discovery pending a motion to dismiss among others. Because discovery is stayed pending a motion to dismiss, plaintiff s lawyers use information obtained from confidential witnesses. In other words, the plaintiff s lawyers first investigate (potential) defendant s illegal activities. I argue that if Korean plaintiff s lawyers are provided enough incentives and a personal information rule allowing certain informant investigations, then Korean plaintiff s lawyers will secure evidence even without the pre-litigation discovery.

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 미국 증권집단소송 사건과 PSLRA

Ⅲ. 정보원에 관한 논의

Ⅳ. 한국 증권관련집단소송 제도 개선 방향

Ⅴ. 결론

로딩중