正确认识宪法规定的公民受教育权的规范性内涵，是切实保障公民受教育权的需要，也是解决当前教育领域诸多深层次矛盾、推动教育体制改革的需要。结合齐玉苓案的剖析，从宪法学的角度进行探讨，可知公民受教育权的规范性内涵主要体现在以下三个方面：公民受教育权的义务人只能是国家等公权力主体；公民受教育权是只能通过立法机关具体化的方式来实施的抽象权利；公民受教育权中所谓教育应限于中小学等基础教育，不包括学前教育、职业教育、高等教育和成人教育。从这三个方面来看，就算宪法司法化可行，齐玉苓案中法院对公民受教育权的理解和适用都是有问题的。
A correct understanding of the normative annotation of the right to education is the guarantee to this right, but also the need to solve the many deep-seated contradictions in the domain of education and promotion the reform of the education system. Combining with the analysis of the case of Qi Yuling, and worrying on the discussion from the perspective of the constitution, citizen’s right to education is a public power subject; citizen’s right to education is an abstract right that can only be achieved through the legislative legislative legislative legislative act; the education of citizens’ right to education should be limited to primary and secondary education, not including pre-school education, vocational education, higher education and adult education. From these three aspects, there are many problems in the court’s understanding and application of the right to education in Qi Yuling’s case.
一、导言：从齐玉苓案说起
二、受教育权的义务人是国家等公权力主体
三、受教育权本质上是需要通过立法来具体化的抽象权利
四、受教育权中所谓教育限于小学和中学等基础教育
五、结语