In this paper, I investigate whether multiple gaps like PGs and ATB-gaps can be unified as Munn(1992, 2001) and Williams(1990) suggest. Focusing on the behavioral asymmetries between multiple gaps, Munn claims that they should be unified, ATB-gaps being incorporated into PGs. On the other hand, focusing on the behavioral symmetry between multiple gaps, Williams contends that PGs should be incorporated into ATB-gaps, both being unified. On the basis of the examination of the behavioral (a)symmetries between multiple gaps in Korean, I conclude that those unification approaches have not much explanatory power and that we should approach PGs and ATB-gaps differently, as Postal (1993) proposes.
1. 머릿말
2. 진 공범주와 기생 공범주의 (비)대칭적 현상
3. 병렬 공범주들 간의 (비)대칭적 현상
4. 다중 공범주에의 통합적 접근에 있어서의 제 문제
5. 맺음말