거란대자(契丹大字) 동사 종결어미(動詞終結語尾)의 초보적 연구

A Rudimentary Study on the Terminating Suffixes of the Verb in the Khitan Large Scripts

There is a limit to detailed research on the terminating suffixes of the verb in the Khitan large scripts as there is not much research so far. However, if we summarize the research results so far, we will be able to get an outline of the terminating suffixes of the verb in the Khitan large scripts. The terminating suffixes of the verb in the Khitan large scripts is known so far, with past forms usually appearing, such as @@, @@, @@, @@ and @@ connected to male words and @@ to female words. Also, based on the analysis in this paper, @@(-n) and 寸(-g) which were identified as the terminating suffixes, were not related to the terminating suffixes of the verb in the Khitan large scripts. In other words, @@ is considered to be part of the determining suffixes, and @@ is not related to the suffixes. And the terminating suffixes @@, @@ analyzed that there is a possibility of being connected to the -ba/-be, -bi, -bai/-bei in the Middle Ages Mongolian In this paper, it is analyzed that @@, @@, @@, @@ is the terminating suffixes of the verb in the Khitan large scripts. Among them, @@, @@ was determined to be either a variant of one character or an analysis of another character, and the sound was estimated to be [-ri]. The Khitan large script @@ is only one example in the Khitan large scripts text, so I think we should find more examples, and the Khitan large script @@ seems to be the terminating suffixes, but more research is needed. In addition to these examples, there are other examples that are assumed to be terminating suffixes, but we would like to discuss them later. The relationship between the terminating suffixes of the verb in the Khitan large scripts and the Mongolian verb appears to be relevant in some cases, but more time is needed to materialize. The terminating suffixes of the verb in the Khitan large scripts may differ depending on the epitaph or the writer of the epitaph. In addition, the distinction between the determining suffixes and the terminating suffixes is sometimes ambiguous because the deciphering of the data is not complete yet. The issue is expected to be resolved when future research progresses.