한국한문학 연구의 반성과 지향

The reflection and intention of the study on Korean Chinese classics

‘Korean Chinese classics’ study should consider ‘Dongmunseon’ compiled in the 15th century as a model. What is called the realism subject consciousness is discovered in ‘Jooui’ and ‘Sangsomun’ as Jicheon. The study focusing on certain writer and certain era is continuing more stubbornly in recent days, it is the assignment Chinese learned circles should avoid quickly. We should no longer remove various and abundant literature and great writers like this. Our scholars are in the time that should not part the name from stall of ‘Korean Chinese classics’ anymore. We have to reestablish complete ‘Korean Chinese classics’ by escaping from Gukchok of Chinese literature and western genre theory. To do so we will have to solve the original subordination idea first the term of ‘Korean Chinese classics’ has. Our scholars should admit that they are excessively involved with the doctrine of the Zen sect, teacher, educational background, and clique, and display their originality and reclaim the brilliant new world. If they judge there is a problem in doctrine of the doctrine of the Zen sect which is regarded as common law in the academic circle and in the doctrine they argued, they have to take courage to abolish them without hesitation. It is necessary to use the footnote of paper and quote the original text. It is serious to make the quotation irrelevant with the paper and excessive original text quotation simple drastically. If this matter is solved, the quantity of the paper will reduce by one sixth and the readers will feel convenient and simplifying the publication will be possible. I expect the scholars to avoid from Sekeunhaenggoi vice they commit involuntarily and to develop the subject readers have interest in and actively globalize it.