상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
커버이미지 없음
KCI등재 학술저널

愚齋 孫仲暾의 金宗直 門人說 考察

『愚齋先生實記』 편찬과정을 통해서

This study explored the process of compiling Ujaeseonsaengsilgi and Ujaejip written by Ujae Son Jung-don (1463~1529) to define his relationship with Jeompiljae Kim Jong-jik. An attempt was made to find its traces in Ujaeseonsaengsilgi and to compare it with Jeompiljaejip so as to explore the relationship between Son Jung-don and Kim Jong-jik. On the basis of the memorial to the Throne written by 222 persons, including Lee Sul-hyeon, a Confucian in South Gyeongsang Province, on February 30, 1790, in addition to Ujaeseonsaengsilgi, it seems that Son Jung-don was already known as a writer along with Kim Jong-jik among Confucians in South Gyeongsang Province at the time of 1790. However, Silgijeungbobalmun in Ujaeseonsaengsilgi never addresses Kim Jong-jik but focuses on defining and informing the teacher-disciple relationship between Son Jung-don and Hoijae Lee Eon-jeok. Lee Byeong-ho s postscript to a part of Silgijeungbobalmun in 1905 and Son Hu-ik s Munjipsigmun in 1935 addressed Kim Jong-jik and his disciples, Kim Gwoing-pil and Jeong Yeo-chang, any of whom hadn t been addressed in Ujaeseonsaengsilgi, and tried to connect them with Son Jung-don. This is probably a social error committed during the process of compiling Silgi as part of the effort to enhance their ancestor s prestige by building a memorial hall and publishing a collection of works from the descendents viewpoint. So this is one-sided insistence by Ujaejip and it is difficult to find the corresponding materials among collections of works written by Kim Jong-jik, Jeong Yeo-chang, and Kim Gwoing-pil, making it hard to define their relationship. While the chronological record in Ujaeseonsaengsilgi reveals that he was under Kim Jong-jik s instruction at the age of 22, this was simply written from the descendent s viewpoint in the 18th century, with no materials found to define the teacher-disciple relationship with Son Jung-don. Only the relationship with his father, Son So, can be found. It seems, therefore, that Son Jung-don had a chance to study with his father, Son So, and Kim Jong-jik and was naturally connected with Kim Jong-jik via his father by future scholars excessive revisions. This is probably because he intended to use the relationship between the leader of Sarimpa, Kim Jong-jik, and his father to consolidate his position externally and to justify himself in consolidating the teacher-disciple relationship with his grandchild, Lee Eon-jeok, internally.

1. 머리말

2. 『愚齋先生實記』 編纂과 『愚齋集』 刊行

3. 孫仲暾과 金宗直의 사승관계에 대한 고찰

4. 맺음말

참고문헌

로딩중