靑泉 申維翰 漢詩의 {楚辭} 受用樣相

A receptive aspect of the Chu-Ci[楚辭] in a Chinese poetry written by Shin Yoo-Han

The purpose of this manuscript is to study a receptive aspect and learning of the Chu-Ci as a part of writing of Chinese poetry with pseudo-archaism [擬古主義] by Shin Yoo-Han who was active as a literary man of the middle class in the first half of the 18th century. He intended actively to introduce something to have been based on their value of literature and recognition of a rhetorical excellence as well as loving of Pre-Qin archaic texts[先秦古文] into poetry and prose. Following the Shih-Ching[詩經], he recognized the value of the Chu-Ci as it realized and succeeded a true expression with sentiment. This came from recognition that it made an orchid or a jade commit the care of a poet s sentiment with a depressed mood what expresses thought or feeling through things, and it embodied a poetic ideal to be of imagery with poetry. Also, it analyzed to divide a rhetorical method which was written in the Chu-Ci into Expression of feeling through things[實中有虛] and Expression of supposition[虛中有實]. It found that the poet s inner sentiment and will would be expressed through setting of situation and things which symbolized it. On the other hand, in an actual poem writing of his Chinese poetry it considered such aspects that his attitude of pseudo-archaism was diverted it into a personal symbolic system as well as accepting a traditional symbol appeared on the Chu-Ci. This manuscript analyzed the symbols with a significant meaning and a high frequent appearance on his Chinese poetry, so that it found that the dragon and a Chinese phoenix have a meaning related to himself who was in adverse circumstances and the orchid and a cinnamon tree was worked as a representation of himself own noble-mindedness. Besides, it studied that motive and thought of Taoism which was contained within the Chu-Ci was introduced into his poetry with any aspect. Thesis found that he was of a friendly disposition to Southern cultural area in Chinese ancient history, however he did not devote himself to a perfect Taoism and also he did not escape from himself own attitude of participation in reality.