사실의 기록과 야담의 진실성

The recording of fact and the reality of Yadam

There was a tradition of writing which based on fact and some real thing. But it changed into fictitious writing in a narratives. Why? This thesis aims to clear the question, and paid attentions to the change of Pilgi and the birth of Yadam. At first, Pilgi were regarded as supplementary recordings on historical records. So Pilgi recorded only real things fact based on facts and also none doubted the truth of recording. But the circumstance of writing Pilgi started to change, there were false recordings and a writer emphasized that he only wrote facts. But it also meant that there would be fictions on recordings. As fact, there were false stories and it started to increase at the late of 17th century. And the writer insist that he write facts even though it were fictions. Though, outwardly, the writer went after former writers writing patterns, and practically they changed their writing patterns. After all, Yadam born at the 18th century. Yadam was a kind of fictional stories. And writers took positive attitude toward fictions and writing to fictions. Concrete facts of Yadam were fiction but the background of Yadam were real. It means that Yadam was born based on recording fact but it changed according to the change of narrative circumstances. So Yadam is a sort of fictional genre based on real things.