The text, written for aesthetic approach of Korean-Chinese literature in attention of Korean prose literature, considers aesthetic consciousness of Korean prose classifying chronologically:The former period, before Musin-nan and the middle period, before-and after-Musin-nan and the latter part, after Musin-nan. After directly inheriting the style of a writing of the late Silla, the former period was remarkable in Sumryeo-mi, which shown the extravagance focusing on rather a fancy and florid style than contents because of a few factors such as Gwang-jong’s Gwageojedo and Seong-jong’s Sungmun-jeong chaek. Because esthetic formalism was getting extreme resulting from excessive Sumryeo in the former period, Gomun began to attrac tinterest with criticizing negative effect on Byeong-ryeomun. The wind of wish forpre-existing Gomun had had blown stronger and Gomunga started to advent in the history of prose resulting from both the collapse of aristocrat in the former period and the appearance of Sinjinsain in the middle period. In the middle period, Jilbakmi, which plainly conveys the idea of writer, was pursued rather than the florid Sumryeo-mi. For improvement of political and social power, Sinheung-sadaebu in the latter part of Goryeo truly needed to achieve victory in conflict with the Sesin-geosil who was master of Dejang-won and the central authority. Therefore, they strongly advocated Seongli-hak asnewideology. As fine and elaborate logical argument with deeper study on Seongli was setting out, the detailed writing, which analyses fine matter internally and was unprecedented before the latter part, was accomplished.
1. 서론
2. 고려 전기의 纖麗美
3. 고려 중기의 質朴美
4. 고려 후기의 精密美
5. 결론
참고문헌