영어교육에서 AI 활용의 한계는 어디쯤일까?

What is the limit for using AI in English education?: Feasibility of using Automated Text Generation and Automated Item Generation.

This study explores the feasibility of using Automated Text Generation (ATG) and Automated Item Generation (AIG) in the field of English education. To this end, 60 pre-service teachers directly tried the two programs and participated in improving the quality of the test item through post-editing. The results suggest the following: First, among the participants who corrected the test items of the participants in this experiment, the pre-service teachers modified their test item 391 times in total. Text correction accounted for 75.19% of the modifications, and option correction accounted for 24.8%. In the program user satisfaction survey, 86% of the ATG program respondents showed a positive attitude. In addition, the fact that none of the respondents selected 'very dissatisfied' suggests that there was a high possibility of using ATG at school. On the other hand, the AIG program respondents demonstrated a relatively low level of satisfaction. Overall, 43% responded positively but 33% of the total respondents took a negative stance. Improvements for both programs collected through open-ended questions were also presented. It is, however, important to note that evaluation of whether or not a post-editing attempt was appropriate was beyond the scope of this study.