This study is to assess “Visit Gyeonggi 2005” with the method of AHP in making decision terms such as arrangement of preference weights among alternative projects and specific plans . Principal results of this study are as follows. Firstly, the difference of relative weights was identified on the level of contribution to the expected goal of each project. Secondly, policy projects and specific plans were significantly inter-influenced in accomplishing each given goal. Thirdly, in composite weights of total projects, the plan, “Si-Gun Festival Support Project”, under the policy project, ‘Development of Festival and Transforming into Tourism Resource’, was on the top of preference weights among 28 plans in total.
I. 서론
II. AHP에 관한 이론적 고찰
III. 연구 방법
IV. 우선순위 도출을 위한 계층화분석
V. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌