Quite a number of literature teachers complain that literary education theories can not help them teach a literary text. Furthermore, they assert those are to stay in a empty discussion. Their argue is about the role of the literary education theory. However it is also considered as setting up the relationship between theory and practice. In this context, I investigated the relationship between academy discourse and education discourse of literary education in South Korea. I also discussed how the incorrect preconceptions about the phenomenon of educational theory, the barriers to enter from educational discourse to academic discourse, and the lack of understanding as a researcher on educational field make a literary education theory be in controversy. And finally I came up with an assignment to carry out from three paths of actualization of academy discourse on literary education, that’s to say, ‘Transition’, ‘Adjustment’, and ‘Didactical transposition’,
1. 이끄는 글
2. 이론의 지위와 성격에 대한 교사들의 인식
3. 실천적 이론과 이론의 실천성
4. 문학교육 담론 간의 소통 구조와 실천성의 정립
5. 맺는 글: 어떤 이론적 주제를 다룰 것인가
(0)
(0)