遊牧文化的觀點에서 본 傀儡子의 發生과 傳播經路試論

A Study on the Generation and Propagation Path of 傀儡子from the viewpoint of nomadic culture through Comitatus

This paper wanted to look at the background and propagation path of the wandering performance group, referred to as kui-lei-zi傀儡子(A performing group that travels across the region, performing puppet shows and acrobats.). The wandering entertainer(kui-lei-zi傀儡子) has often been described starting from India and the gradual shift of the group to the east. In this paper, we looked at the three characteristics of Comitatus, the system of the Huns' group, primarily be based on historical references to central Eurasia, in order to look at the trajectory of the middle ground to reach China, depending on these existing theories. We looked at what was regarded as the characteristic of the Comitatus of the Huns and the Huns, namely, the device for performing the task of protecting both life and death with external hostile forces, i.e. the association of the Comitatus was discussed over three items, including the ImHyop Group(a group of brave and strong men united in their determination to give their lives for the leader by drinking the blood of the beast and vowing to die together the same day). The task of protecting the present world and the afterlife states is maximized in the same post as Bangsangsi, and the three items can each have a consistent meaning, given that the Impeachment group formed around one martial art is a mechanism for establishing the relationship between the master and warrior in the real world, and that the Sunjang custom(A burial system in which a person belonging to the ruling class of a group is forced or voluntarily buried together after that person when he or she dies) is a mechanism for performing the same role as the clinician group of life in the afterlife. Against this backdrop, a wandering group performing puppet shows, acrobats, etc. who would have been born cannot specify its path of propagation, but it is assumed that it was spread to China and Korea, respectively, through China, and gradually to Central Eurasia along the path of medicine, exchange and Buddhism. Among these arguments, it is at the center of the discussion that it is thought that the Xiongnu group had the most influence on the propagation path. In particular, since the discussion of the relationship between 'the wandering entertainer(kui-lei-zi傀儡子) and the comitatus discussed in this paper was based mainly on the contextual reasoning, there is still work to prove the original logic by securing more objective and concrete details.