漢韓反預期標記“竟然”和“다니”的主觀性類型對比研究

Chinese “竟然” and Korean “다니” are typical counter-expectation markers in Chinese and Korean. They exhibit different grammatical characteristics in different language aspects, but different counter-expectation markers also have obvious subjective characteristics. Therefore, from the perspective of subjectivity, this paper compares and analyzes the subjectivity types of the Chinese “竟然” and Korean “다니”. The preliminary conclusions can be drawn as follows: according to the classification of relevant subjectivity types and statistics, we can obtain the rank sequence of “surprise＞strange＞dissatisfaction＞surprise＞disappointment＞praise＞fortunate” when “竟然” indicates subjectivity. Korean “다니” indicates the rank sequence of “surprise＞dissatisfaction＞disappointment＞strange＞surprise＞praise＞fortunate”, and it can be initially concluded that these two expressions are relatively typical counter-expectation markers, while in the distribution of other subjectivity types, the frequency of Korean “다니” expressing negative “dissatisfaction” and “disappointment” is significantly higher than that of Chinese “竟然”, which has a more prominent negative semantic tendency, while the frequency of “surprise”, “praise” and “fortunate” in Chinese is significantly more than that in Korean “다니”, and it has a more prominent positive semantic tendency.