상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
커버이미지 없음
KCI등재 학술저널

제1차 세계대전 이후 “유럽의 발칸화”에 대한 엘리엇의 진단과 처방

T. S. Eliot’s Diagnosis of and Prescription forthe “Balkanisation of Europe” after the First World War

DOI : 10.22536/bapoet.2019.25.2.119
  • 11

This paper explores how T. S. Eliot(1888-1965), as a poet and as a critic, diagnosed the aftermath of the first World War as the “Balkanization of Europe” and prescribed the “tradition” embodying “the mind of Europe” for the split of Europe into separate nations especially after the Treaty of Versailles. The first section discusses seemingly contradictory but complementary roles of the poet and the critic by comparing a poem “Gerontion” with a prose work “Tradition and the Individual Talent,” both published around the time when the treaty was signed (1919.06.28). The second section shows how the poet illustrates the split of Europe without any possibility of mutual communication: he diagnosed the situation and re-presented it as a “heap of broken images” or “these fragments” in “What the Thunder Said” of The Waste Land (1922). Parallel to the second section, the third section examines how the critic and editor of The Criterion(1922-1939.01) tried to build up not political or economic but literary, cultural and religious solidarity among separate European nations till after the second World War when he re-claimed the ‘unity of European culture.’ The last section comments on the limitations of Eliot’s Euro-centric response and recent Anglo-American studies on this issue, introducing two different interpretations of Eliot’s diagnosis and prescription by his contemporary Korean writers―Jae-Sou Choi and Ki-Rim Kim.

Ⅰ. 「보잘 것 없는 노인네」, 「전통과 개인의 재능」: 1919년, 시인 엘리엇과 비평가 엘리엇

Ⅱ. 「천둥이 말한 것」 『황무지』 (1922): “이 파편들을 나는 내 폐허에 맞서 떠받쳐 왔다”

Ⅲ. 『크라이테리언』(The Criterion 1922.10~1939.01)과 후기 산문: “유럽의 정신”

Ⅳ. 결론을 대신해서: 당대 식민지 조선 문인의 시각―최재서와 김기림

인용문헌

로딩중