Auden (1907-1973)’s The Sea and the Mirror raises questions about the value of art in the context of Auden's Christian beliefs and Kierkegaard’s Christian existentialist philosophy. It considers whether art has a moral responsibility or it is a play. In this article I trace Auden's view of art within the context of The Sea and the Mirror and weigh the critics' comments regarding this topic. Auden used various metaphor to represent art including circus, mirror, magic and shadow. In the preface the stage manager uses the metaphor of a circus to show what art is. Through the metaphor of a circus he points out how the world of art is different from reality. In Part I, Prospero discards his magic by throwing out his magic books and breaking his magic wand. His actions show his resolution to give up art and to choose instead the religious existence. In Part II, supporting cast stands outside of the magic circle, however its members still pursue romantic love, wine and dreams. In Part III, Caliban regards the art as a mirror which reflects life. He articulates the difficulties within which that artist is situated to show reality through the medium of art. Later Auden rebukes the view which regards art as a serious work. He believes that writing poetry is something frivolous, for enjoyment only. This view of art is represented in the Sea and the Mirror.
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 곡예로서의 예술: 「서문: 무대감독이 비평가들에게」
Ⅲ. 마술로서의 예술: 프로스페로가 에어리얼에게
Ⅳ. 마술의 원 밖에서: 「조연자들 : 서로에게 작은 소리로」
Ⅴ. 거울과 그림자로서의 예술:「캘리번이 관객에게」와 「후기」
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌
(0)
(0)