The major purpose of this study is to show the insufficiency of traditional epistemology and consructivism as episte- epistemology is not sufficient to explain episteme in educational situation because it regards that epsteme is the phenomenon occurs between the abstract individual subject and the object world. Modern epistemology like constructivism recognize the public or social character of epsteme. So it is more appreciate than traditional mology of mathematics education. Traditional epistemology such as empiricism, rationalism, Kant's epistemology, and Piaget's genetic epistemology to explain episteme in math educational situation. But constructivist pedagogy derived from constructivist learning theory has the following important shortcoming: The lack of clear criteria by which instructional effectiveness might be evaluated from a constructivist perspective.
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 개인적 인식론 비판
Ⅲ. 구성주의 비판
Ⅳ. 결어
참고문헌
(0)
(0)