혁신인증 유형에 따른 중소기업의 생존기간 비교․분석

Comparative Analysis for Survival Period of SMEs According to Innovation Certification Type

생존기간의 관점에서 혁신인증 유형(벤처, 이노비즈, 메인비즈)에 따라 유의한 차이가 있는지를 분석하였다. 사건은 부도에 준하는 연체로 정의하여 생존기간을 산출하였으며, 혁신인증 연도를 기준으로 혁신인증 중소기업의 업력, 고용인원, 재무상태(자본과 부채, 매출액과 영업이익), 산업별 구성을 통제변수로 설정하였다. 분석 결과 통제변수를 고려한 상황에서도 혁신인증 유형에 따라 유의한 생존기간의 차이를 확인하였다. 혁신인증의 경우 이노비즈인증 기업은 벤처인증 기업 대비 연체 발생 위험이 31.2%, 메인비즈인증 기업은 벤처인증 기업 대비 연체 발생 위험이 29.3% 감소하여, 이노비즈인증과 메인비즈인증은 생존기간에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 기업 생애주기를 고려하여 혁신인증 혜택을 차별화할 필요가 있으며, 혁신인증 전환 시 추가 혜택을 제공하는 등 연계를 강화할 필요가 있다는 결론을 도출하였다.

In terms of survival period, it was analyzed whether there was a significant difference according to the type of innovation certification (venture certification, inno-biz certification and main-biz certification). The event was defined as overdue equivalent to default, and the survival period was calculated. Based on the year of innovation certification, the work experience, number of employees, financial status, and composition by industry of innovation certified SMEs were set as control variables. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that there was a significant difference in the survival period depending on the type of innovation certification even when the control variables were considered. Inno-biz certified companies and main-biz certified companies had a 31.2% and 29.3% reduction in overdue risk, respectively, compared to venture certified companies. Therefore, it is necessary to differentiate innovation certification benefits by considering the life cycle of a company. In addition, it was concluded that there is a need to strengthen the connection between certifications, such as providing additional benefits when converting innovation certification.