상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
비평과 이론 제28권 2호.jpg
KCI등재 학술저널

들뢰즈와 과타리의 ‘분리 종합’ 이론

Theory of ‘Disjunctive Synthesis’ of Deleuze and Guattari

DOI : 10.19116/theory.2023.28.2.115
  • 144

Deleuze and Guattari’s first co-authored work was a 1970 paper called “Disjunctive Synthesis”. It is said to be an abridged version of their forthcoming ‘Capitalism and Schizophrenia’, referring to Pierre Klossowski’s recent work. This paper is a draft of the rationale for Anti-Oedipus. Interestingly, however, there are no studies that address the relationship between the “Disjunctive Synthesis” and Anti-Oedipus. “Disjunctive Synthesis” is very helpful in that it unravels and clarifies the ambiguity of Anti-Oedipus. Furthermore, the paper shows Deleuze and Guattari’s initial problem with Anti-Oedipus, concerning the unconscious. In particular, the rupture that separates Anti-Oedipus from The Logic of Sense is identified. I have followed the “Disjunctive synthesis” in order to clarify the problem that the paper is trying to solve, and to show the points that correspond to the “paths” and “bridges” of how this problem develops later in Anti-Oedipus. I have particularly focused on elucidating the inclusive, illimitative, and affirmative usages of the “disjunctive synthesis” in the synthesis of the unconscious.

들어가는 말

1. 『의미의 논리』와 ‘분리 종합’

2. 「분리 종합」이 해명하려는 문제

3. 「분리 종합」의 ‘분리 종합’(1): 포괄적 용법

4. 「분리 종합」의 ‘분리 종합’(2): 주체의 탄생

5. 나가며: 『안티 오이디푸스』의 종합 이론

인용문헌

로딩중