측정방법에 따른 정직성 효과의 차이

Differences in Effects of Honesty Measurement Methods: Situational Judgment Test Format vs. Likert-type Rating Scale

본 연구의 목적은 정직성을 상황판단검사 형식과 Likert 식 평정형 척도로 측정했을 때 다양한 준거에미치는 효과에서 차이를 보이는지를 알아보는데 있다. 본 연구에서 사용한 준거는 도덕 해제, 과업수행, 맥락수행 및 반생산적 업무행동이다. 직장인 721명(남=46.65%, 여53.95%)의 자료가 분석에 이용되었다. 정직성을 상황판단검사 형식과 Likert 식 평정형 척도 형식 두 가지로 측정하였다. 상관계수에대한 비교분석 결과, 정직성을 상황판단검사 형식으로 측정했을 때가 Likert 식 척도로 측정했을 때보다 정직성과 도덕해제, 과업수행 및 맥락수행과의 상관이 더 높게 나타났다. 구조방정식 모형을 분석했을 때도 정직성을 상황판단형식으로 측정했을 때가 Likert 식 척도로 측정했을 때보다 모형의 적합도가더 좋은 것으로 나타났다.

The purpose of this study was to verify whether honesty, as measured by a situational judgment test format and a Likert-type rating scale, differs in its effect on different criteria. The criteria used in this study were moral disengagement, task performance, context performance, and counterproductive work behavior. Data from 721 employees (male=46.65%, female=53.95%) were used in the analysis. Honesty was measured in two ways: a situational judgment test format and a Likert-type rating scale. The results of the correlation coefficients showed that honesty was more highly correlated with moral disengagement, task performance, and contextual performance when measured by the situational judgment test than when measured by the Likert-type scale. When analyzing the structural equation model, it was found that the overall fit indices of the model were better when honesty was measured in a situational judgment format than when it was measured in a Likert-type scale.