청년주거 지원 조례 비교 연구

A Comparative Study on the Housing Support Ordinances for Youths

Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study is to derive revision plans of the housing supporting ordinances for youths through comparison of local government ordinances in order to alleviate the serious housing problems. Methods: By analyzing data from the National Law Information Center's autonomous law system, 11 metropolitan and local governments' ordinances related to housing for youths were compared. As an analytical framework for comparison of ordinances, five factors( the rights(purpose and ideology of the ordinance, the accountability of the local government heads), the universalism of allocation, comprehensiveness of benefits, financial responsibility of local government heads, accountability and integration of the delivery system) in content system of social welfare ordinance were used. Results: Among the 11 local government ordinances, the Seoul ordinance was the most suitable for ideal content system of social welfare ordinance. The Seoul ordinance received high marks in terms of the rights, comprehensiveness of benefits, financial responsibility of local government heads, accountability and integration of the delivery system. But the legal binding force of the housing support ordinances for youths were very low compared to other social welfare ordinances. Conclusion/Implications: Change to a 'basic' ordinance focusing on 'youth', new regulations on civil rights, new establishment of accountability for heads of local governments as an independent clause, change of meeting minimum housing standards to mandatory regulations, expansion of benefit comprehensiveness, introduction of the excavation subject and network for youths living less than minimum housing standards, were proposed.