상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
아태비즈니스연구 제14권 제4호.jpg
KCI등재 학술저널

조직시민행동이 비윤리적 친조직행동에 미치는 영향

Effect of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Unethical Pro-organization Behavior Focused on the Moderating Effect of Machiavellism

DOI : 10.32599/apjb.14.4.202312.205
  • 92

Purpose - The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of organizational citizenship behavior on unethical pro-organization behavior considering two sub-dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior such as citizenship behavior for individual and citizenship behavior for organization. In addition to this, this study was to identify of the moderating effect of machiavellism. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected 269 sample questionnaires from employees who are working for Korean companies. To examine the hypotheses, this study used hierarchical regression analysis. Findings - First, results showed that there is a significant positive effect of citizenship behavior for organization on unethical pro-organization behavior, but citizenship behavior for individual did not have any significant effect on unethical pro-organization behavior. Second, same with the previous results, machiavellism only had its significant moderating effect on the relationship between citizenship behavior for organization and unethical pro-organizational behavior, not on citizenship behavior for individual. The moderating effect strengthened the positive relationship. Research implications or Originality - Although organizational citizenship behavior and unethical pro-organization behavior are studied many times, but there is no research examining the relationship between these two concepts. these two concepts share the figure that these behaviors are pro-organizational. The only differences between the two is ethical or not. So, this study identified the relationship and moderating effect of machiavellism. In doing so, this study provided novel implications for the researchers of this filed.

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 조직시민행동과 비윤리적 친조직행동

Ⅲ. 마키아벨리즘의 조절효과

Ⅳ. 연구방법론

Ⅴ. 실증분석 결과

Ⅵ. 결론

References

로딩중