상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
한국전략문제연구소_전략연구.jpg
KCI등재 학술저널

[특집] 한국적 입장에서 본 포괄적 안보와 협력안보에 대한 연구

A Study of Comprehensive and Cooperative Security from the Korean Perspective

The concept of national security is an illusive one at best. Consequently, we are often in a state of confusion when we debate what ought to be included in its consideration. The problem is that the sense of national security is ultimately a subjective matter. Furthermore, security no longer is confined by its conventional definition. but is multi-faceted, with each aspect warranting examination and study. The means of national security have traditionally been identified with the issues of military power, national defence, war, and peace. In the history of mankind, the twentieth century has been the most serious century in terms of the competition among states. Many nations were destroyed not by an external enemy, but by their internal problems. Nation has always been involved in war preparedness, and moreover in the utilization of its resources to supplement military prowess. The disturbing fact is that recently the expansion of violence in society for ideological and political purposes can be seen in ahnost every state. Such internal violence undermines not only national security, but quite frequently international security as well This violence has been propelled by criminal activity and also by ideological goals. Terrorism and other militant violence have particularly strong international linkages. The development of modern communication and transportation systems has increased the vulnerability of inter-dependent, integrated civil societies. Therefore, we must have a more comprehensive security program for each state. The nature of competition among nations has recently changed, so the concept of national security must also change as well. Traditional states, which still preserve traditional values and institutions, may be unable to cope with these newly emerging demands from various sectors of international society. Violent and non-violent crime, money laundering, political corruption, international drug trafficking and abuse, smuggling and illegal sale of weapons, and terrorism may end up destroying the fabric of societies, and in return threaten national security. Particularly, the post cold war order world requires the “extended security” concept due to the multi-faceted linkages of crime from abroad Consequently, comprehensive and cooperative security in this situation becomes a very important polemic ill the national security agenda. The traditional concept of national security has evolved exclusively around the military capability of a nation. Under the Cold War system, military power was considered to be almost the only method to deter others from possible aggression. During this period, the threat of nuclear war was the predominant concern regarding national security. Limited conventional wars and guerilla warfare were next in priority in regards to national security. The end of the Cold War followed by the emergence of a new world order, social changes in each nation, and the appearance of new transnational threats have combined to induce change in the traditional way of thinking about national security. Transnational crimes have repeatedly threatened or even destroyed social structure in many states. The increase in worldwide crime is the result of an interplay between failures in national and international planning and rapid social change. The emergence of crime that is aggressively transnational in nature rapidly extends criminal activity beyond the confines in which the domestic jurisdiction of states can operate effectively without cooperation from other states. Thus the transnationalization of criminal organizations has become an important contributing factor to the destruction of ordinary society. It may also become imperative to national security systems. After the Cold War, many countries give priority in their security concerns to internal stability, national development, and social harmony. Understandably, this is a result from their sense of vulnerability to internal threats.

Ⅰ. 본 연구의 목적

Ⅱ. 전통적 의미와 국가안보

Ⅲ. 한국 안보여건의 현실적 추이

Ⅳ. 포괄적 안보와 협력안보의 시대적 요구와 사례

Ⅴ. 포괄적 안보, 협력안보와 한국의 안보

Summary

로딩중