<똥파리>에 나타난 민족지성(Ethnographicness) 고찰

A Discussion on the Ethnographicness of 'Tongpari(The fly of dung)'

Anthropological filmmaking helps to make the meaning and function of Ethnographic film communicate to audience. Those function is proxemics as a place for communication and kinesics as mime to communicate and choremetrics as studying for actions. The scholor of anthropology must to achivement the role of ethnographic scholor. We remembered a documentary film, <Nanook of the North> directed by Robert Flaherty. This ethnographic film was a good film to tell the story which shows native life and exotic atmosphere till 1930. the new style of ethnographic film appeared in 1960 at France. The first of cinema verite was knowned by <Chronicle of a Summer> made by .Jean Rousch and Edgar Morin. They try to introduce new recording technology and participate to filmmaking with prudence by producer. As the result they can make ture ethnographic film. Which film influences to international film director like Godard the represented of Newbellbague. Lee, Mungwoong who introduce a ethnographic film in Korea ask what is ethnographic film? He answered that ethnographic film requires for cinematography and ethnography to meet over the technic combination. The ethnographic film shows to interpreter all things about recording through the all course of filmmmaking in frame work. In this thesis I will dicuss <The fly of dung>'s ethnographicness through I introduce and discuss <The fly of dung>. I hope appearing the new Korean film to contribute keeping Korean identy secondly, I pursue the identy theory of Korean film based on the preceding western sysmetical theory. I expect that Korean film which shows Korean's ethnographicness will restore the life of korean identy culture.