Analysis of Criminal Legal Risks and Response Concepts of Artificial Intelligence in the Digital Age

The emergence of Artificial intelligence has brought social development to unprecedented heights.It brings enormous benefits to society, but also contains many criminal legal risks, mainly including the risk of infringing data security, the risk caused by algorithm errors, and the risk of causing intellectual property disputes. The deveiopment of the new positive things must consider the effects of new things.By examining the differences between the concepts of positive criminal law and modesty, we aim to identify a suitable model for the innovative development of Artificial intelligence.The positive criminal law perspective emphasizes relying on criminal law to prevent criminal legal risks through Artificial intelligence, but the universal criminal law perspective will lead to technological stagnation and inability to cope with diverse criminal legal risks. Therefore, we should adhere to the governance philosophy of humility. Since artificial intelligence has brought huge benefits, the tolerance for its risks should also be increased accordingly; Maintain the modesty of criminal law, leave sufficient space for pre emption, build a balanced legal system, and systematically manage the criminal legal risks of Artificial intelligence; Adhere to the principle of proportionality, fully consider the principle of proportionality when applying criminal law, reduce the impact of criminal law on Artificial intelligence, ensure the development of Artificial intelligence, and adhere to the principle of balancing safety and development.

人工智能的出现使得社会的发展达到了前所未有的高度。其为社会带来巨大利益的，同时也蕴含着诸多刑事法律风险，主要包括侵犯数据安全的风险、算法错误引起的风险、引起知识产权纠纷的风险。新生积极事物的发展必须考虑创新与规制之间的平衡点，一味限制必然导致新生事物的积极作用被抑制。通过考察积极刑法观与谦抑性两种观念的差异，辨析适合人工智能创新发展的模式。积极刑法观强调依靠刑法实现人工智能刑事法律风险的防范，但是万能刑法观将会导致技术的停滞不前，且无法应对多元的刑事法律风险。为此，应当坚持谦抑主义的治理理念，提升对人工智能带来风险的容忍度；保持刑法的谦抑性，为前置留足空间，构建平衡的法律体系，系统治理人工智能的刑事法律风险；坚持比例原则，在适用刑法时充分考虑比例原则，降低刑法对人工智能的影响，保障人工智能的发展，坚持安全与发展并重原则。