상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
Journal of Chinese Legal Studies (JCLS) Vol.1 No.3.jpg
학술저널

The Overall Comparison Between China's Criminal Record Sealing System and Moral Compensation System With Those of Other Countries

中国与其他国家犯罪记录封存制度与精神赔偿制度对比的总体对比

DOI : 10.62989/JCLS.2024.1.3.62
  • 2

Article 286 of the Criminal Procedure Law clearly stipulates that juveniles who have committed crimes shall be subject to a system of sealing criminal records, so that juveniles with criminal records can avoid the negative impact of criminal records and enjoy the same rights as other normal persons on an equal footing, so that they can truly reform and return to society. While relieving the mental and social pressure of minor offenders, the criminal record sealing system should also ensure that the victims are adequately compensated for mental injuries. Compare the criminal record sealing system and the moral compensation system at home and abroad, and explore the legal balance between the rights and interests of victims and the rights of offenders.

犯罪记录封存制度,刑事诉讼法第286 条明确规定了对犯罪的未成年人实行犯罪记录封存制度,给有过犯罪记录的未成年人避免前科带来的负面影响,能够平等地享有与其他正常人一样的权利,使其真正改过自新,回归社会。犯罪记录封存制度缓解轻度违法人员精神和社会压力的同时,也应该保障受害人的充分精神伤害赔偿。对比国内外犯罪记录封存制度与精神赔偿制度,探索受害人权益与犯罪者权利之间的法制平衡。

1 美国、英国、新家坡犯罪记录封存制度的特点、利弊和典型案例

2 中国犯罪记录封存的论文综述和发展趋势

3 美国精神赔偿制度特点和赔偿金额标准以及典型案例

4 中国精神赔偿制度的特点和赔偿金额标准以及典型案例

5 中外精神赔偿制度和赔偿标准的对比

6 犯罪记录封存制度必须与精神赔偿赔偿标准对应以保护受害人的整体利益

参考文献

로딩중