祛魅—复归—超越：对《帝国》的一些再解读

Disenchantment, Restoration and Transcendence: Some Reinterpretations of Empire

Based on a logical framework of politic-subjectivity, Antonio Negri and Michael Hart attempt to construct a kind of deconstruction in a kind of political economy and revolutionary politics, and resort to a grand revolutionary narrative under postmodernity. However, the empire is trapped in a kind of “historical probability” in the construction of a “road of sovereignty” and “the road of production”, and carries out a kind of “disenchantment” of territorial logic and capital logic, so that it is trapped in a kind of value logic, that is, when resorting to a “humanistic logic”, it returns to a “material-based logic”. The proposal of whole-process people’s democracy and a community with a shared future for mankind has completed the leap from a value paradigm of “material-based logic” to “humanistic logic”, and provided a Chinese wisdom and Chinese solution.

安东尼奥·奈格里与迈克尔·哈特立足于一种政治性——主体性的逻辑架构，试图在一种政治经济学与革命政治学中进行一种解构中的建构，诉诸于一种后现代性下的宏大革命叙事。但是，帝国却在一种“主权的道路”与“生产的道路”建构中陷于一种“历史或然性”，将领土性逻辑与资本性逻辑进行了一种“祛魅”，以至于陷于一种价值性逻辑的复归，即在诉诸于一种“人本逻辑”之时却复归于一种“物本逻辑”。而该如何打破这一难题却成为一种历史之问，全过程人民民主与人类命运共同体的提出则完成了一种“物本逻辑”到“人本逻辑”价值范式的转化，提供了一种中国智慧、中国方案。