Syntactically, the syntactic structure - Behavior before result after, reflected from the VCO structure accords with the syntactic requrement of the complement. But many Insertional components can ge involved between V and C freely, and there aur lots of CV structrues, all of these can prove that the syntactic relationship between V and C is not close. Semantically, the semantic relationship-“action-resuli” from VCO structrue accords with the semantic requirement of the complement. But because of the insertional compenents the 'action-result'semantic relationship becomes less efficient. Not only that, there are lots of 'result-action' semantic relationships from CV structure which indicate the semantic relationship between V and C is not perfect. Pragmatically, the pragmatic function of the VCO comes from the semantic structure in the dynamic context. If the semantic relationship is not perfect, its pragmatic structure is not perfect too.
句法上,VCO 所体现的“行为在前,结果在后”的句法结构符合补语的句法条件,但各种性质的插入成分随意进入V和C之间,CV结构的大量存在等语法现象都从句法上表明了V和C之间的句法关系还不紧密。语义上,VCO所内含的“行为-结果”语义关系符合补语的语义条件,但各种插入成分的存在弱化了“行为-结果”这一语义关系。而且,“结果-行为”语义关系的大量存在也表明了V和C之间语义组合的任意性和不成熟性。语用上,VCO结构的语用功能是在动态环境中,通过“行为-结果”语义关系实现的,语义关系不成熟,所实现的语用结构也是不成熟的。
1. 绪论
2. 述补宾结构的特征
3. 述补宾结构的发展
4. 结论
(0)
(0)