한중 경험상 대조분석

A contrastive study of Experiential aspect markers in Korean and Mandarin Chinese

In this paper, we compared and contrasted Chinese experiential marker guo with Korean marker essess-, -un ceki iss-,and -un ili iss-. The experiential sentences must satisfy the semantic properties of experiential i.e. ‘repeatability’ and ‘indefiniteness /nonspecificity’. Korean marker -essess- cannot satisfy these semantic conditions―― ‘indefiniteness/nonspecificity’, whereas -un ili iss-, and -un ceki iss- have the semantic properties of experiential sentences. In terms of experiential category, Mandarin experiential -guo must be distinguished from the other morpheme -guo(i.e. complementary -guo). We also studied the discourse function and the negation of experiential sentences. In conclusion, we presented the semantic and syntactic differences between experiential -guo and complementary -guo.