상세검색
최근 검색어 전체 삭제
다국어입력
즐겨찾기0
학술저널

『격암유록』 국립중앙도서관 소장본의 저본(底本)

  • 한국종교학회
  • 宗敎硏究-최중현
  • 宗敎硏究 第35輯
  • 2004.06
    249 - 275 (27 pages)
  • 69
커버이미지 없음

In discussion about prophetic texts in general, it is useful to put a focus on original material(jeobon) rather than on original copy(weonbon). Among four manuscripts such as Haeju Ossibon, Gyeogamrok, Sansupyeongjang, and Seoulbon, the last one is the most promising candidate as the original material from which the Gyeogamyurok was possibly made.<BR> Turning to such studies, we can overcome the years-long debate as to whether or not the Gyeogamyurok was written really by Nam Sago. With increasing amount of information on original materials of prophetic texts, we can improve our understanding about that general situation which most of prophetic texts have historically come through.<BR> Generally speaking on prophetic books, forgery has not been an exception, but the rule.

Ⅰ. 문제의 출발<BR>Ⅱ. 필사자 이용세의 주장<BR>Ⅲ. 발견된 자료들<BR>Ⅳ. 맺는 말<BR>참고문헌<BR>부록<BR>【Abstract】<BR>

(0)

(0)

로딩중