This study introduces some recent findings made possible by the bibliographical researches in Korean Classical Prose. They are as follows:<BR> First, the myth of Tongmy?ng is distinguished from the myth of Chumong in that the former belongs to Puy? mythology while the latter belongs to Kogury? mythology.<BR> Second, the appearance of the Korean version of S?lgongchanj?n(薛公瓚傳) proves the existence of novels in Korean prior to Honggildongj?n(홍길동전).<BR> Third, the Korean version of Chusangj?n(周生傳) proves that the audience of the grotesque novels expanded to the lower class.<BR> Fourth, Wangsibongj?n(왕시봉전) and Wangsibunggiugi(王十朋奇遇記) are novels that were revised from the Chinese play Hy?ngchgi9荊釵記). Fifth, the bibliographical evidence that Honggildongj?n(홍길동전) should be seen as the first novel in Korean is not well-founded.<BR> Finally, the heroic novel that caused a murder case in late Chosun Dynasty in the cigar shop where the novel was read in front of the audience was Imgy?ng?pj?n(임경업전).
Ⅰ. 머리말<BR>Ⅱ. 동명신화와 주몽신화의 관계<BR>Ⅲ. 〈설공찬전〉 국문본 출현의 의의<BR>Ⅳ. 〈주생전〉 국문본 출현의 의의<BR>Ⅴ. 〈왕시봉전〉ㆍ〈왕시봉기우기(王十朋奇遇記)〉와 중국희곡 〈형차기〉의 관계<BR>Ⅵ. 〈홍길동전〉 최초 국문소설설의 문헌적 근거 재검토<BR>Ⅶ. 조선후기 소설 낭독 현장에서 살인을 야기한 작품의 정체<BR>Ⅶ. 맺음말<BR>Abstract<BR>
(0)
(0)