In this paper, we classify criticality prediction models into four types according to the input metric forms and the necessity of the past project data. Many prediction models for identifying fault-prone modules using complexity metrics have been suggested. But most of them are VI-SL models that need training data set. Unfortunately very few organizations have their own training data. To solve this problem, we build a new VI-UL model, KSM, based on Kohonen SOM neural networks. We compare and evaluate KSM and a well-known VI-SL model, BPM, considering internal characteristics, utilization cost and accuracy of prediction. As a result, we show that KSM has similar performance with the VI-SL model.
ABSTRACT<BR>Ⅰ. Introduction<BR>Ⅱ. Classification of prediction models<BR>Ⅲ. New VI-UL model<BR>Ⅳ. Simulation study<BR>Ⅴ. Conclusion<BR>Ⅵ. References<BR>
(0)
(0)