Edge Impulse Machine Learning for Embedded System Design
Edge Impulse Machine Learning for Embedded System Design
- (사)디지털산업정보학회
- (사)디지털산업정보학회 논문지
- 17(3)
-
2021.099 - 15 (7 pages)
- 0
In this paper, the Embedded MEMS system to the power apparatus used Edge Impulse machine learning tools and therefore an improved predictive system design is implemented. The proposed MEMS embedded system is developed based on nRF52840 system and the sensor with 3-Axis Digital Magnetometer, I2C interface and magnetic measurable range ±1200uT, BM1422AGMV which incorporates magneto impedance elements to detect magnetic field and the ARM M4 32-bit processor controller circuit in a small package. The MEMS embedded platform is consisted with Edge Impulse Machine Learning and system driver implementation between hardware and software drivers using SensorQ which is special queue including user application temporary sensor data. In this paper by experimenting, TensorFlow machine learning training output is applied to the power apparatus for analyzing the status such as “Normal, Warning, Hazard” and predicting the performance at level of 99.6% accuracy and 0.01 loss.
In this paper, the Embedded MEMS system to the power apparatus used Edge Impulse machine learning tools and therefore an improved predictive system design is implemented. The proposed MEMS embedded system is developed based on nRF52840 system and the sensor with 3-Axis Digital Magnetometer, I2C interface and magnetic measurable range ±1200uT, BM1422AGMV which incorporates magneto impedance elements to detect magnetic field and the ARM M4 32-bit processor controller circuit in a small package. The MEMS embedded platform is consisted with Edge Impulse Machine Learning and system driver implementation between hardware and software drivers using SensorQ which is special queue including user application temporary sensor data. In this paper by experimenting, TensorFlow machine learning training output is applied to the power apparatus for analyzing the status such as “Normal, Warning, Hazard” and predicting the performance at level of 99.6% accuracy and 0.01 loss.
(0)
(0)